Sunday, May 8, 2011

Pursuing Academic Pride at Univ. of Connecticut



Pursuing a balance with NATURE

_____________________________________________________________

Hydrology Breakthrough vs. USPTO Conspiracy


"Violation of science: bad apples and/or systems failure?"

Why Bad Apples Spoil the Barrel?


The Conspiracy – USPTO is running a broad Reinvention Scheme that let Lawyers writing scientific patents and allowing IP rights of issues they are not known in the art!


‘...  If you have a point to make about my treatment of hydrological concepts, I ask that you take the time to explain your specific points of disagreement.  I note that my work is better represented in my publications (available at http://www.stroockgroup.org/home/publicationsthan in patents, as the lawyers have been translated the latter into legalese that I do not understand.

Food for thought – If an inventor PhD from Harvard can have USPTO issued patents to protect his intellectual property rights but he does NOT understand it, how much the Patent Attorney and Patent Examiner knows about the issue granted protection by US Government. If it holds true, it means that Lawyers know about science more than scientists doAmazing! I just imagine Albert Einstein trying to get patents with his scientific papers .. . It means that those guys in the patenting affairs would handle Theory of Relativity more than him . . . Now I understand why Americans are the leaders of the world . . . awesome, this is simply magical. Mayday Mr. Snowden .  . .mayday mother nature!

My ‘scientific breakthrough’ deals deeply with Hydrogeology/Soil Physics/Hydrology. When I took classes at the Pennsylvania State University of such disciplines during my PhD in Soil Science I remember seeing no single Law student as classmate.

If my patent was being violated I had simple questions to pursue:

·       Was it a casual violation or a clear biased trend?
·       Had the examiner already cited my patent earlier?
·       Did the inventors and examiner have technical-scientific background in the issue?
·       Was the violator a wealthy party?
·       Was the examiner citing my patent to be sure he was granting new claims not claimed before?
·   Why my issued patent was being randomly cited for irrelevant patents and ignored when violated blatantly? 
-------------------



This is the tip of the iceberg as of what lies  bellow, clearly points out distorted conceptions and beliefs on human culture WHEN LAWS OF MAN IGNORE LAWS OF NATURE.


From: Moulis, Thomas <
Thomas.Moulis@uspto.gov>
 
Date: Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:40 PM 
Subject: RE: Conspiracy and Brainwashing III – USPTO is preaching to their Patent Examiners that they do not need to be known in the art for judging and allowing IP rights when issuing patents! 
To: Elson Silva, PhD <tubarc@gmail.com>

You are a fool--- 

If you can’t understand legal or technical writing, you have no business blogging about it 

Wicking” is a term of art---fluid will travel in any direction via the fibers—regardless of gravity

-------------------

"Wick/wicking is in the patent classification system but not on HYDROLOGY textbooks."


LEGAL WICKING as the term of the art regardless of gravity confirms USPTO long standing bias ignoring hydrology on conductivity parameters of issued patents (11/30/23):


Thermal/Heat Conductivity                       176.074 pat.

Electric/Electrical Conductivity                139.254 pat.

Hydraulic Conductivity                                  1.329 pat.

Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity                  38 pat.

Wick/wicking                                                      66.415 pat.


The US Government states that LEGAL WICKING is not technical, being inert to gravity LAW, meaning that LEGAL OIL LAMPS and LEGAL CANDLES can work upsided down. This sort of deceiving is behind the Economic Melting Down of 2008 burning about 41 trillion dollars, also dumping 1,1 million American as the leader of the COVID-19 pandemic catastrophe that  took around 7 million lives world widely. In addition, obesity and sedentarism letting human beings miss brain capacity by becoming grumpier and dumber on neurogenesis effect.

Science is our understanding on nature functioning. Humans learn to respect nature early as babies on the first steps taming gravity for walking and running. Soon we understand the consequences of missteping and falling down. Therefore, all issued patents dealing with wick/wicking are CERTAINLY frauded because PATENT EXAMINERS ignored their homework from the beginning of their lives - GRAVITY

Sir Isaac Newton defined the Law of Universal Gravitation in 1687. He was inspired to formulate his theory of gravitation by watching the fall of an apple from a tree.

---------------------------------
De: Owen, Steven [mailto:steven.owen@uconn.edu]
Enviada em: quarta-feira, 5 de outubro de 2011 11:36
Para: Elson Silva, PhD
Assunto: RE: {SPAM?} Protecting Hydrology Science from REINVENTION

Mr. Silva, has anyone ever called you a nutcase

Are people out to get you? 

Are you having some trouble keeping up with your medications?


---------------------------------
Steven V. Owen
University Professor Emeritus
Educational Psychology

---------------------------------

Dr. Owen, my medicine is a bit bitter than that one swallowed by Albert Einstein by just stretching his tongue:

http://youtu.be/E3d-JRg28p8

https://youtu.be/czv2OiiC5wA


_____________________________________________________________


This email from an Emeritus Faculty of Educational Psychology provided valuable insights and feedback showing how deep the academic community is compromised on scientific affairs in the US.They were supposed to know that Darcy’s Law on Hydraulic Conductivity is not written in the US constitution, but endorsed by Mother Nature.


_____________________________________________________________

Nobel Prize is IMPORTANT TO HUMAN KIND, as 50% is business, 40% politics, 5% bad science and 5% good science from an educated abstraction. Nobel Prize Nomination of Economic Science was introduced to pretend that Human Business could overlap nature functioning. THE US AS THE FIRST ECONOMIC POWER IN THE WORLD GRABBED TWO-THIRDS (411/621) OF NOBEL PRIZE NOMINATIONS FOR SCIENCE. Exploratory Analysis shows that the American scientific community has been violating Hydrology science in the Patenting System more than a century, leaving a gap huge enough for a new science Hydrotechnology.  It seems that working with the Chemistry of explosives is far more profitable than the Hydrology of self-watering flower pots. Mr. Alfred Nobel, Arms Dealer, Merchant of Death, and Father of Dynamite, got 355 patents and Albert Einstein got 50 issued patents to portray top scientists claiming intellectual property rights. Obesity, Economic Melt Dow, COVID-19 tragedies, and now Reinvention Policy by USPTO are important evidence of American negligence to science misbalance with Nature.

How much NATURE endorses the Economy and Politics? Sunlight and rain come to us FREE OF CHARGE, regardless of BOUNDARIES, making the Economy not a science, but a distorted human affair as basic Laws of offer and demand is being replaced by GREED and FEAR. Likewise,  recent wars in Ukraine and Israel show us that Politics can’t be science, but a wicked manipulation on human issues wasting innocent lives and spoiling the landscape for weaponry industry profit and disguised interest as Homo sapiens misses simple rationality.

In my neighborhood, I saw the Scientific Police taking pictures of swings I installed on trees for children in the Park during the COVID-19 pandemic lock down. Society try to employ the word SCIENCE for POWER, but there is a misunderstanding as scientific principles claim TRANSPARENCY and HONESTY. Nature is in charge of SCIENCE as there is no POLICE to enforce Nature LAWS. Even religion try to use Scientology for credibility. I like the simple conception that God = Nature. However, Nature writes no books, promises no lands, no life after death, no war or death in name of a divine. In around 4 billions of years of our planet, it seems that we got no aliens to affect our evolution. Most probable we are not leaving our home until the end in 4 to 6 billions of years. Human challenge is to keep nuclear weapons safe, cropping soils, mining our minerals and preserve our home in balance with nature functioning, making our blue planet good for all humans. 

What we see in the universe is just for light travelling.

It seems that few scientists do understand the meaning of their titles PhD as Philosophy Doctor coming from Philosophy of Science (Epistemology, Metaphysics, Logics, and History of Science).

_____________________________________________________________


The Conspiracy





Abraham Duncan Stroock
Dept: Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering
Title: Associate Professor

Education

Ph.D., Harvard University, Chemical Physic (2002)
M.S., University Paris VI and XI,Solid State Physics (1997)
B.A. Cornell UniversityPhysics (1995)


De: Abraham Duncan Stroock [mailto:abe.stroock@cornell.edu]
Enviada em: terça-feira, 22 de abril de 2014 22:20
Para: Elson Silva, PhD
Assunto: RE: [06856] Protecting Hydrology Science from REINVENTION by corrupt LAY PEOPLE colluding with USPTO - US Pat 8,701,469

Dear Dr. Silva,
‘...  If you have a point to make about my treatment of hydrological concepts, I ask that you take the time to explain your specific points of disagreement.  I note that my work is better represented in my publications (available at http://www.stroockgroup.org/home/publications​) than in patentsas the lawyers have been translated the latter into legalese that I do not understand.

Best regards,

Abe
___________________________________________________________
De: Elson Silva, PhD [mailto:el_silva@uol.com.br]
Enviada em: terça-feira, 22 de abril de 2014 23:40
Para: 'Abraham Duncan Stroock'
Cc: cko3@cornell.edu; TDO1@cornell.edu; MGS22@cornell.edu; SBW11@cornell.edu; el_silva@uol.com.br
Assunto: RES: [06856] Protecting Hydrology Science from REINVENTION by corrupt LAY PEOPLE colluding with USPTO - US Pat 8,701,469
Prioridade: Alta

Abe,

You are so naive.

‘…Are you sure you got your PhD at Harvard? ‘

Lawyers learn nothing about Hydrology in Law School.

As far as I know no Law School provides Hydrology teaching . . . No Lawyer could discuss Hydrology having no expertise in the subject!

This is funny!
You do not give your scientific papers to Lawyers, so why are your patents different?
(By the way, was it a Lawyer who wrote your PhD thesis?)

Also, Lawyers are illiterate on the functioning of science, besides most scientists have no idea about Epistemology, Metaphysics, Logics, and History of Science (Philosophy of Science).

_________________________________________________________________



University of Connecticut

Office of the President

352 Mansfield Road, Unit 2048

Storrs, CT 06269-2048

Philip E. Austin

President

(860) 486-2337

president@uconn.edu

Respecting Hydrology Science and IP Rights in the Patenting System

Inventors, Attorneys, and Examiners,

It seems that the American patenting system is becoming a nightmare by breaking of Law and violation of science! Such violations are not by another country, or another language, but in the same patent office and sometimes by the same Patent Examiner. It is frustrating sending thousands of IDS (Information Disclosure Statement) to demand Inventors and Attorneys to respect what was already issued by the same Patent Office.

I am not an inventor but a PhD scientist with deep comprehension on the underlying functioning of science. My background comes from Agricultural Sciences focusing on spatial applied hydrogeology.

I simply decided to pursue my ‘scientific discovery in Hydrodynamics’ in the US just because I was a Brazilian getting PhD at Penn State University when the American president Bill Clinton was at my commencement on May 10, 1996 convincing his country was reliable. He said that we were part of privileged citizens receiving the highest education that the American institutions could offer their citizens and that down the line we would be creating new jobs never imagined before. The economic meltdown, spreading obesity, oil spill, etc. are cues that the public order is deeply out of track to protect society functioning in a country that intends to lead the world.

My recent surprise is that my IP rights are being violated by flawed patents from wealthy parties that sometimes even do not work or dumb parties trying to reinvent what I already did.

Sometimes nature is so blessed to create people bearing the highest level of stupidity. It is possible to steal money, jewelry, paintings, cars, etc. But, can you steal an invention? Can you reinvent what is already invented and patented?

There is no wick/wicking in Hydrology, but it is part of the language as lay people handle oil lamps and candles since its invention about 70,000 years ago at the Stone Age Time. The Advanced Classical Hydrology Science addresses the issue as Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity having a complex hydrodynamic functioning far beyond the restricted oil lamp functioning moving fluids UPWARD toward a flame.

It can be found on scientific literature about Electrical Conductivity, Thermal Conductivity, and Hydraulic Conductivity, but never Wicking Conductivity!

Indeed laypeople behind wicking have no handle on the Hydrodynamic properties to address the core issue. The expression of wick/wicking comes from lay people that never gauged Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity, have no idea about Hydraulic Zones, anisotropic unsaturated flow, vertical hydraulic gradient potential, molecular connectivity, self-sustaining reversible flow, molecular drainage, void ratio, pore connectivity, porosity geometry, self-cleaning filtering, inertial/rotating energy addiction/subtraction, etc. It is a huge gap waiting to be explored as science prevails.

I suggest you to study and learn Hydrology if you want to file patents that deal with fluidic devices. It is very likely that you are wasting your time and money, distorting the patenting system helping Americans getting rewards for negligence like this oil spill that easily could have been prevented by a sound science - HYDROLOGY. Like the outcome of Titanic fate as key people are used to cover up blunders to dissimulate their persistent wrongdoings turning the ship on the wrong direction during a crisis, not halting the cruise to save passengers, and ultimately lying to protect the businesses. Wise people know what is going to prevail and the potential outcome to achieve when honesty, coherence, and respect are embraced.

Academic Dishonoring of a scientific breakthrough

Dr. Amir Faghri and Dr. Zhen Guo working at the former Fuel Cell Center at the University of Connecticut believed that Hydrology from their Library can be ignored as well as my patent rights at USPTO when issuing US 7,625,649 ‘Vapor feed fuel cells with a passive thermal-fluids management system’ on the right. It was sent many letters requesting IDS of US 6,766,817 to many faculties and Intellectual Property management team at Univ. of Connecticut. Nobody there felt any urge to respect neither Classical Hydrology nor already issued patents on the subject. There is no doubt about breach of Ethics and breaking the Law by reinventing something already invented.

It seems that Mechanical Engineers insist on working with fluids having a private Hydrology on their own ignoring Classical Hydrology from old textbooks. US 6,766,817 not only designed the interplay between Hydraulic Zones allowing self-sustaining reversible flow, but also it gauged Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity as 2.18 mm/s, besides Tubarc as an enhance microporosity geometry for fluid conduction.

Looking at the drawings I have a deep feeling that it was a straight lousy copycat by a PhD faculty showing arrogance and how stupid he can be by ignoring a ‘scientific breakthrough’.

Is US 6,766,817 a ‘scientific discovery’?

I believe so because so far only 24 issued patents mentioned Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity while wick/wicking from lay people is mentioned in 26.852 issued patents today Mar 24, 2011.

I am curious why graduate students get PhD titles not learning about Philosophy of Science: Epistemology, Metaphysics, Logics, and History of Science.

Corporate Manipulation

There is a widespread Hydrological ignorance among inventors working with fluidic applications. The Procter & Gamble Company declined any interest on my five idea applications: 11526, 11170, 11533, 11534, and 11979. But, afterwards my ideas started coming poorly inside their patent applications and I had to ask IDS like happened to 20080015531.

“When rejecting something it is important to have confidence that you do not need it, and that you have no intention to overstep such rejected boundaries. It may be a pretension to be smart or just an evidence of missing wisdom.”

This picture on the right would suggest that PG has only lay people in Hydrology working with fluidic application and that the system is very negligent to control their R&D guidelines. There is no doubt about the importance of advanced Hydrology to PG product lines dealing with personal hygiene, mainly absorption or retention of fluids on artificial porous systems.

My suggestion to Law Firms and general companies filing patents on fluidic devices is to hire experts from Geosciences so that the advanced Hydrology from my textbooks and my issued patents are respected scientifically and legally. Also, there is no other way for product development besides employing advanced science holding on textbooks more than a century and widely accepted on scientific literature

Flawed Violation

Hydrology Science is being shamefully ignored in the Patenting System with flawed patents that violate common knowledge from scientific literature and issued patents. It seems that sometimes the Patent Examiner (US pat. 7,285,255) violating science and issued patents is a director meaning that lay people handling Hydrology at USPTO is a critical bias going up in the chain of power by people that are overstepping Ethical grounds beyond their due expertise. I was expecting people in the patenting affairs be a kind of smarter and more respectful as NATURE cannot be deceived. This was not a simple mistake by a junior Patent Examiner since Ms. Gladys Corcoran issued 202 patents so far.

Ecolab employs more than 26,000 people With more than $6 billion in global sales. I sent letters to Ecolab, to Kinney & Lange, P.A the patent law firm, and to USPTO about violating my patent rights with a flawed one that even does not work. The fluid only drops after crossing the water table reference as portrayed in the arrow reference. The aggravation is that after I notified all parties in written about the violation of IP rights and scientific flaws more patents applications were filed and issued. This is just unacceptable. What kind of protection anybody can get by ignoring IP rights and scientific literature?

Mr. Gregory Morse a Patent Commissioner said that there is a Law stating that the drawing dimensions does not need to represent the real dimensions of the device. I replied saying that I learned in High School about scale that all details are represented in the same proportional ratio and that the scientific flaw of (US pat. 7,285,255) takes places at any scale like parallel lines that never meet each other at any scale employed. I got PhD in Soil Science/Spatial Applied Hydrology with a deep background in Remote Sensing and GIS and now I have my ‘scientific breakthrough’ being violated by lazy patents from people that their background is lower than High School standards. It seems that Mr. Clinton wasted his time on my commencement.

Reinventing by Wealth Corporation

There is a blurring overlapping between negligence and stupidity. The Patent Examiner Mr. Max Hinderburg cited my patent US pat. 6,766,817 on May 27, 2008 assigning 7,377,904, but recently he assigned a violating patent to Roche Diagnostics on October 26, 2010 US Pat. 7,819,822 ignoring totally my patent (left) as well as the claims in it portraying Tubarc (Tuber + Arc) to replace capillarity and set new conceptions in Hydrodynamics for Unsaturated Hydraulic Flow. There is something fishy behind such violations coming always from very wealthy parties assuming that their money can circumvent science and IP rights.

So far I sent to Mr. Obama 17 letters getting no reply. Nobody can argue any ignorance since I sent 4,737 letters to people in the patenting system requesting them to respect my IP rights and my ‘scientific discovery’. The Patenting Firm Woodard Emhardt Moriarty McNett & Henry LLP behind this shameful violation I sent 17 letters. Also I sent 31 letters to Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc.

There is another aggravation since I sent many letters to Roche Diagnostics about my ‘scientific breakthrough’ and for good faith the company was supposed to have asked IDS (Information Disclosure Statement) to provide a good intention that they have no intention to violate my IP rights. Then my patent US pat. 6,766,817 was supposed to be cited when allowing US Pat. 7,819,822 showing that the Patent Examiner was aware on my claims and that he was known in the art to judge the issue.

What is going on at USPTO? Bribery, Corruption, and/or Collusion ? ? ?

There is an ugly side of Roche endeavors as it can be figured out at the picture on the left regarding the appropriate geometry from the patent application 20070197937 on August 23, 2007. They had no Hydrology background to handle the issue of fluid moving on porous system regarding spatial geometry as they learned with my issued patent, got the appropriate functioning and got a Patent Law company breaking the Law poorly claiming again my invention. I have been notifying all involved parties on many instances and my issued patent should have been referred.

It is unlikely that a pharmaceutical company would hire Geologists or Soil Scientists. So, they have no handle on the Hydrodynamic properties to address the core issue. They never gauged Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity, have no idea about Hydraulic Zones, anisotropic unsaturated flow, vertical hydraulic gradient potential, molecular connectivity, self-sustaining reversible flow, molecular drainage, void ratio, pore connectivity, porosity geometry self-cleaning filtering, inertial/rotating energy addiction/subtraction, etc.

‘This sort of thing makes me feel appalled like when a thug that steals my car, but just at the time of getting away with my belonging he discovers not being able to drive it!’

Roche employs around 67,000 people, has revenue around 46bn dollars, and total assets around 80bn dollars. Can this power bend science?

Background

There are around 26,000 issued patents by USPTO on wick/wicking which is not in Hydrology scientific literature only used by lay people missing a broader and deeper understanding in the field of the art. The phenomenon was addressed as Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity in 1907 by Edgard Buckingham to update Darcy’s Law 1856. US pat. 6,766,817 deployed it to the patenting system just a century after being in the scientific literature. Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity measures volume/area/time within Unsaturated Hydraulic Zone with vertical gradient that addresses fluid flow by molecular connectivity allowing self-sustaining and reversible flow between the Hydraulic Zones responding to Hydraulic gradients. Also, I designed an enhanced micro geometry for porosity dubbed Tubarc (tube + arc) just to replace capillarity which has limitations due to the tube theory constrictions harming fundamentals of Unsaturated Hydraulic Flow. Tubarc principles also take into account restrained human capability to handle tiny dimensions of atoms and a need to organize random porosity providing higher control on hydrodynamic properties. Such insights for Tubarc development were borrowed from the biological porosity of Phloem and Xylem structures in the very early beginning of life on a need of multicellular organism to grow and expand its dimension keeping everything inside connected hydrodynamically. So far wicks are just good enough for oil lamps which are dependent on fuel and a flame (Thermodynamics + Hydrodynamics). Wise people are supposed to know that any wick that cannot work as a wick betrays Etymology and fail. Why to claim something that has no bearing?

My ‘scientific discovery’ in Hydrodynamics US pat. 6,766,817 is being constantly violated by lay people that has no background in Classical Hydrology. Since 2006 I have been requesting USPTO to hire Hydrogeologists and/or Soil Physicists to examine fluids moving on porosity to comply with long standing Classical Hydrology endorsing common knowledge. I even sent 17 registered letters to Mr. Obama which could be read online on my blog, but people at the White House seem neither read English nor care about Hydrology outcome in the US since I got no reply. This recent oil spill catastrophe is a simple message from nature that better venues should be sought and advanced Hydrology could be missed. Instead of promptly expelling drunken teenagers that curse the president on emails, the staff seems to have other more relevant issues for the country to take care of.

The importance of respecting Science avoiding lay people overtake advanced science is that society is better served with significant edge for the technological advancement sometimes critical on special circumstances. The oil spill at the Gulf of Mexico could have been stopped in the very early beginning if Hydrologists were in charge of Hydrological affairs. Only lay people would employ ‘Junk Shot’ using golf balls and shredded tires to clog a well. The oil was spilling through a well lumen 4.5 km deep in the seabed with an upward flow against gravity and it could have been easily clogged using simple conceptions of Soil Erosion and Conservation which teaches about detachment, transport, and deposition of particles in a dynamic flow. So, the ‘Junk Shot’ was supposed to employ high density sinking format particles that could go down by gravity against an upward bubbling flow moving at about 2 to 3 cm/s. The spilling well could have been clogged in few hours but it lasted 87 days leaking nearly 5 million barrels of crude to the main American basket of sea food, not only harming businesses, but also annihilating wildlife and jeopardizing a stable livelihood for many trusting their leader. It seems that the worst oil spill in the US was a simple consequence of ignoring Hydrology.

My Demand to USPTO

It is not that hard to argue at the Court of the Law that Hydrological issues should be examined by Hydrologists. My demand to USPTO is the same as the first letter sent on Oct. 2006:

1. Hire Examiners with background in Hydrogeology and/or Soil Physics so that they have full comprehension of fluids moving on porosity;

2. Cancel issued patents with scientific flaws. Obsolete patents are cancelled naturally by becoming outdated;

3. Make a public statement about Hydrology negligence hurting all Hydrological community as well as my project that needs experts in Hydrology to protect the content of my issued claims.

4. Compensate for my losses since as an inventor filing patents I was not expecting lay people handling hydrology in the examination process by USPTO.

5. Since USPTO is failing to protect my IP rights my patents should be eligible for time extension of their expiration dates (new demand).

6. Issue a bill requiring Hydrology be handled by Hydrologists preventing laypeople from harming standing common knowledge in the scientific literature (new demand).

7. Make people accountable for breaking the Law regarding my complaints (new demand).

Recently USPTO confirmed that there was no Hydrologist as a Patent Examiner. Also, I have never met any Law Firm employing a Hydrologist confirming my suspicion that a huge technological gap is bumping to our noses saying that lay people are covering up a field they have no handle and no idea of their lack of comprehension. It is like kids flying kites trying to create airplanes without going to school.

Nature coherence is so enlightening since rain falls from the sky, recharges and carves the landscape draining back towards the ocean renewing something that cannot be challenged, just because it is the makeup of what we belong to. We have the power to think and we think we are intelligent by developing distorted values about the principles of our own existence. Wild animals that are not intelligent did not develop any urge to hide their genitals, neither spoiling their food, nor getting fat. Indeed always keeping their muscles in good shape so they can run away from predators or catch their meals, surviving in balance like they always did since the beginning of life. That is indeed funny: those species that are not intelligent do not jeopardize the basic principles of their survival as we intelligent species do! Perhaps we need to go back and update the meaning of being intelligent because there is an evident flaw in the coherence – we are a stupid species pretending to care for our own existence.

Our cannibal ancestors believed that eating the brain of their competitors would give them more intelligence with a magic power. Deep reasoning on human uniqueness points out that during our evolution probably we chased and ate our cousins matching with scarce relatives nowadays. For lay people this exceptionality makes us Children of God but there is an underlying gloomy side of human joy for perverting common sense. In the past we did not know while today we just pretend to know it, but those ones to guide have no idea on what to pursue.

Why attorneys, inventors, and examiners want to pursue flawed patents that neither work nor respect common knowledge, even less IP rights?

Sorry, simple ignorance cannot be a plausible excuse in a developed country.

My message is straight – go and learn about Hydrology to take the best you can on fluidic devices because it has been neglected leaving a huge gap to explore and get new insights that nature endorses.

Science cannot be distorted because it is just a play trying to guess how nature works.

Kind regards,

Campinas, May 8, 2011

Elson Silva, PhD

Av. Dr. Julio Soares de Arruda, 838

Parque São Quirino

13088-300 Campinas, SP, Brazil

Phone 55 *19 3256-7265

Email: el_silva@uol.com.br

No comments:

Post a Comment