HYDROTECHNOLOGY - A New Science
Pursuing a balance with NATURE
_____________________________________________________________
This is the tip of the iceberg as of what lies bellow, clearly points out distorted conceptions and beliefs on human culture WHEN LAWS OF MAN IGNORE LAWS OF NATURE.
From: Moulis, Thomas <Thomas.Moulis@uspto.gov>
Date: Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:40 PM
Subject: RE: Conspiracy and Brainwashing III – USPTO is preaching to their Patent Examiners that they do not need to be known in the art for judging and allowing IP rights when issuing patents!
To: Elson Silva, PhD <tubarc@gmail.com>
From: Moulis, Thomas <Thomas.Moulis@uspto.gov>
Date: Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:40 PM
Subject: RE: Conspiracy and Brainwashing III – USPTO is preaching to their Patent Examiners that they do not need to be known in the art for judging and allowing IP rights when issuing patents!
To: Elson Silva, PhD <tubarc@gmail.com>
You are a fool---
If you can’t understand legal or technical writing, you have no business blogging about it
“Wicking” is a term of art---fluid will travel in any direction via the fibers—regardless of gravity
-------------------
"Wick/wicking is in the patent classification system but not on HYDROLOGY textbooks."
LEGAL WICKING as the term of the art regardless of gravity confirms USPTO long standing bias ignoring hydrology on conductivity parameters of issued patents (11/30/23):
Thermal/Heat Conductivity 176.074 pat.
Electric/Electrical Conductivity 139.254 pat.
Hydraulic Conductivity 1.329 pat.
Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity 38 pat.
Wick/wicking 66.415 pat.
The US Government states that LEGAL WICKING is not technical, being inert to gravity LAW, meaning that LEGAL OIL LAMPS and LEGAL CANDLES can work upsided down. This sort of deceiving is behind the Economic Melting Down of 2008 burning about 41 trillion dollars, also dumping 1,1 million American as the leader of the COVID-19 pandemic catastrophe that took around 7 million lives world widely. In addition, obesity and sedentarism letting human beings miss brain capacity by becoming grumpier and dumber on neurogenesis effect.
Science is our understanding on nature functioning. Humans learn to respect nature early as babies on the first steps taming gravity for walking and running. Soon we understand the consequences of missteping and falling down. Therefore, all issued patents dealing with wick/wicking are CERTAINLY frauded because PATENT EXAMINERS ignored their homework from the beginning of their lives - GRAVITY.
LEGAL WICKING as the term of the art regardless of gravity confirms USPTO long standing bias ignoring hydrology on conductivity parameters of issued patents (11/30/23):
Thermal/Heat Conductivity 176.074 pat.
Electric/Electrical Conductivity 139.254 pat.
Hydraulic Conductivity 1.329 pat.
Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity 38 pat.
Wick/wicking 66.415 pat.
The US Government states that LEGAL WICKING is not technical, being inert to gravity LAW, meaning that LEGAL OIL LAMPS and LEGAL CANDLES can work upsided down. This sort of deceiving is behind the Economic Melting Down of 2008 burning about 41 trillion dollars, also dumping 1,1 million American as the leader of the COVID-19 pandemic catastrophe that took around 7 million lives world widely. In addition, obesity and sedentarism letting human beings miss brain capacity by becoming grumpier and dumber on neurogenesis effect.
Science is our understanding on nature functioning. Humans learn to respect nature early as babies on the first steps taming gravity for walking and running. Soon we understand the consequences of missteping and falling down. Therefore, all issued patents dealing with wick/wicking are CERTAINLY frauded because PATENT EXAMINERS ignored their homework from the beginning of their lives - GRAVITY.
Sir Isaac Newton defined the Law of Universal Gravitation in 1687. He was inspired to formulate his theory of gravitation by watching the fall of an apple from a tree.
Enviada em: quarta-feira, 5 de outubro de 2011 11:36
Para: Elson Silva, PhD
Assunto: RE: {SPAM?} Protecting Hydrology Science from REINVENTION
---------------------------------
Steven V. Owen
University Professor Emeritus
Educational Psychology
---------------------------------
Dr. Owen, my medicine is a bit bitter than that one swallowed by Albert Einstein by just stretching his tongue:
_____________________________________________________________
This email from an Emeritus Faculty of Educational Psychology provided valuable insights and feedback showing how deep the academic community is compromised on scientific affairs in the US.They were supposed to know that Darcy’s Law on Hydraulic Conductivity is not written in the US constitution, but endorsed by Mother Nature.
_____________________________________________________________
Nobel Prize is IMPORTANT TO HUMAN KIND, as 50% is business, 40% politics, 5% bad science and 5% good science from an educated abstraction. Nobel Prize Nomination of Economic Science was introduced to pretend that Human Business could overlap nature functioning. THE US AS THE FIRST ECONOMIC POWER IN THE WORLD GRABBED TWO-THIRDS (411/621) OF NOBEL PRIZE NOMINATIONS FOR SCIENCE. Exploratory Analysis shows that the American scientific community has been violating Hydrology science in the Patenting System more than a century, leaving a gap huge enough for a new science Hydrotechnology. It seems that working with the Chemistry of explosives is far more profitable than the Hydrology of self-watering flower pots. Mr. Alfred Nobel, Arms Dealer, Merchant of Death, and Father of Dynamite, got 355 patents and Albert Einstein got 50 issued patents to portray top scientists claiming intellectual property rights. Obesity, Economic Melt Dow, COVID-19 tragedies, and now Reinvention Policy by USPTO are important evidence of American negligence to science misbalance with Nature.
How much NATURE endorses the Economy and Politics? Sunlight and rain come to us FREE OF CHARGE, regardless of BOUNDARIES, making the Economy not a science, but a distorted human affair as basic Laws of offer and demand is being replaced by GREED and FEAR. Likewise, recent wars in Ukraine and Israel show us that Politics can’t be science, but a wicked manipulation on human issues wasting innocent lives and spoiling the landscape for weaponry industry profit and disguised interest as Homo sapiens misses simple rationality.
In my neighborhood, I saw the Scientific Police taking pictures of swings I installed on trees for children in the Park during the COVID-19 pandemic lock down. Society try to employ the word SCIENCE for POWER, but there is a misunderstanding as scientific principles claim TRANSPARENCY and HONESTY. Nature is in charge of SCIENCE as there is no POLICE to enforce Nature LAWS. Even religion try to use Scientology for credibility. I like the simple conception that God = Nature. However, Nature writes no books, promises no lands, no life after death, no war or death in name of a divine. In around 4 billions of years of our planet, it seems that we got no aliens to affect our evolution. Most probable we are not leaving our home until the end in 4 to 6 billions of years. Human challenge is to keep nuclear weapons safe, cropping soils, mining our minerals and preserve our home in balance with nature functioning, making our blue planet good for all humans.
What we see in the universe is just for light travelling.
It seems that few scientists do understand the meaning of their titles PhD as Philosophy Doctor coming from Philosophy of Science (Epistemology, Metaphysics, Logics, and History of Science).
Abraham Duncan StroockPara: Elson Silva, PhD
Abe
Enviada em: terça-feira, 22 de abril de 2014
Cc: cko3@cornell.edu; TDO1@cornell.edu; MGS22@cornell.edu; SBW11@cornell.edu;
Assunto: RES: [06856] Protecting Hydrology Science from REINVENTION by corrupt LAY PEOPLE colluding with USPTO - US Pat 8,701,469
_________________________________________________________________
Office of the President
Philip E. Austin
President
(860) 486-2337
Why is the
It will be demonstrated easily that that oil spill at the
‘.Coherence suggests you getting rid of a bad apple before it spoil the entire basket . . .’
Sometimes when sending emails requesting honesty and respect for Hydrology science as well as obeying THE LAW in the patenting system people reply saying that I have mental problems and I should seek professional assistance.
So, politely I ask them to watch the videos below to suggest me what kind of professional could assist me handling my problems:
War on Terror http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_wHDG1HX2jA
50th Birthday http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTfr15wUdjo
Attorney?
- Well, my two former American partners Patent Attorneys owning 45% of the IP rights of my ‘scientific breakthrough’ quit assuming this hardship was far beyond their scope! I knew I did not invent a new can opener but I had laid down NEW CONCEPTIONS IN HYDRODYNAMICS, something beyond the boundaries of Metaphysics of Science to test how much Epistemology notch guys can handle…
Of course if I were a wealthy inventor bearing millions of dollars to waste on a failing Law System I would not be sending you emails.
- Your Honor, I am here respectfully requesting you to cancel that violating patent that even does not work and was not supposed to have been issued. Even less, Your Honor it was not supposed to have been written by lay people that do not have a required deep expertise on the subject so plenty on long standing and old as accepted scientific literature. Your Honor I am wasting millions of dollars that I do not have on Courtrooms and precious time simply because people fail on their basic duties and deserve to be accounted for.
- Your Honor I believe that that oil spill could have been clogged in the beginning if my science Hydrology were respected in the functioning of society and the consequences are building up.
- Your Honor, as a scientist I am aware that humans are not that perfect, but we certainly need to upgrade our own belief on what we really are as we look around it does not require a blessed brain to perceive that we are out of track with the simple purpose of our existence – Your Honor, I come from Animal Husbandry and honestly I feel that we are fattening ourselves like pigs ! ! !
Why is
Just because they are so dictators that when a citizen spoils the country future, like the economic meltdown, they give death penalty instead of bonuses for burning trillions of dollars and erasing millions of jobs. I believe if
I have doubt about the outcome of American Democracy vs. China Dictatorship, on which one would protect the fundamentals of human existence to the core. Freedom? Nonsense! Just try to walk around naked like the way you were born to see the full abstraction of freedom you think that you are naturally endowed . . .
That is funny!
( . . . a waste of valuable time to anyone who has received this email).
Indeed those guys do not understand internet capabilities:
Web anniversary on BBC ‘. . . I saw then that a new power of communication had begun with the web.. .’
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/talking_point/6113746.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/talking_point/5250104.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/talking_point/6088350.stm
Perhaps if people receiving my emails have brain they will not waste their time in the future understanding that the Patenting System USPTO is a sham running by the US Government like Guantanamo Bay by unlawfully incarcerating and torturing innocent people just to endorse weapon industry and army budget using terrorism as a scapegoat. My surprise is having faculties from the academic environment stepping over the boundaries. . . . I am aware that the pharmaceuticals like Roche have no Ethics and the profit must come at any chance, but universities are supposed to mold sound values to society. They are supposed to know that science cannot be distorted . . . at least if they knew the meaning of PhD in their titles!
I have no doubt that the Classical Hydrology will prevail to fluidic devices. My challenge now is just to make it happen during my life time.
I bet that Mr. Ghosh below missed the point. I hope he learns about Phlogiston on Theory of Science to understand why Antoine Lavoisier is the father of Modern Chemistry by deploying a simple Equal Mass Law Equation.
Oh my Gosh . . .
Cheers,
Elson Silva, PhD
Av. Dr. Julio Soares de Arruda, 838
Parque São Quirino
13088-300 Campinas, SP, Brazil
Phone 55 *19 3256-7265
Email: el_silva@uol.com.br
Dear Dr. Santiago-Tosado,
It seems that respect is something missing around there. I sent thousands of emails just asking respect for science, a classical one – Hydrology.
As a matter of fact I am sending 72,762 emails to UConn asking people to be respectful.
I am asking you to be respectful and you say that you do not want to be involved on respecting issues . . . . .
Respecting Hydrology Science and IP Rights in the Patenting System
It seems that you are demanding something from me that is not available there . . .
Respectfully kind regards,
Elson Silva, PhD
Av. Dr. Julio Soares de Arruda, 838
Parque São Quirino
13088-300 Campinas, SP, Brazil
Phone 55 *19 3256-7265
Email: el_silva@uol.com.br
-----Mensagem original-----
De: Santiago-Tosado, Gladys [mailto:gladys.santiago-tosado@uconn.edu]
Enviada em: terça-feira, 12 de abril de 2011 11:39
Para: 'Elson Silva'
Assunto: RE: Pursuing Academic Pride at Univ. of Connecticut
Dear Dr. Silva,
I ask you respectfully to stop involving me on your emails.
Thanks,
Gladys M. Santiago-Tosado, Ed.D.
Director/Adjunct Faculty
Puerto Rican/Latin American Cultural Center
Student Union, Room 441
Telephone: (860) 486-1135 Fax: (860) 486-4642
e-mail: gladys.santiago-tosado@uconn.edu
http://prlacc.uconn.edu
From: Elson Silva [mailto:el_silva@uol.com.br]
Sent:
To: Santiago-Tosado, Gladys
Cc: Elson Silva
Subject: RES: Pursuing Academic Pride at
Dear Dr. Santiago-Tosado,
The reason is quite simple. I believe that you can read and understand it. Also, you may be in favor of a sound educational and scientific environment as academic pride is a goal to pursue.
Thanks,
Elson Silva, PhD
Av. Dr. Julio Soares de Arruda, 838
Parque São Quirino
13088-300 Campinas, SP, Brazil
Phone 55 *19 3256-7265
Email: el_silva@uol.com.br
-----Mensagem original-----
De: Santiago-Tosado, Gladys [mailto:gladys.santiago-tosado@uconn.edu]
Enviada em: terça-feira, 12 de abril de 2011 10:03
Para: 'Elson Silva'
Assunto: RE: Pursuing Academic Pride at Univ. of Connecticut
Dear Dr. Silva,
Why are you sending me these emails?
Gladys M. Santiago-Tosado, Ed.D.
Director/Adjunct Faculty
Puerto Rican/Latin American Cultural Center
Dear Mr. Ghosh,
It seems that you have no expertise in Hydrology as you pursue a graduate program in Electrical Engineering. Well, at least you know that there is something called Electrical Conductivity. In Hydrology we have Hydraulic Conductivity also to portray volume/area/time of fluid moving through a porous system. When the fluid moves under suction we call it Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity. Wick/wicking is not portraying in my Hydrology books.
Wick/wicking is not supposed to be used technically beyond oil lamps and candles and there is a very complex hydrology functioning far beyond it already portrayed in the scientific literature as HYDROLOGY IS ONE OF THE OLDEST SCIENCE.
Dr. Faghri was supposed to reply my communication thanking me for letting he know what is already in the patenting system USPTO and cite my patent obeying the law below.
There is a simple rule that you cannot invent what is already invented.
It is very disappointing having my ‘scientific discovery’ being violated by lay people and that sometimes with scientific flaws.
It is difficult to know what is professional and what is not. Having my patent violated by flaws is a pain.
I am not comfortable with Hydrology being neglected so shamefully in the
My procedure now is just a quake as the tsunami may come afterwards packing strengthen to release the power of nature. UConn is just a small bate to go after big fish like Roche. We need to put people in jail, get fired, and protect the functioning of society.
I will create a new science to solve this scientific and technological gap: H Y D R O T E C H N O LO GY. Just to bring Geosciences to fluidic devices and all pertaining associations to fluid dynamics regarding molecular connectivity. I am not worried about fame and wealth but providing a better outcome for young generations on how to do things right and respect nature.
By the way, I suggest you to read about Philosophy of Science in case you want to get PhD. Most PhD does not learn even about their titles on the deep underlying functioning of science.
We have some duties to protect Science.
Cheers,
§ 1.56 Duty to disclose information material to patentability. - PATENT RULES
(a) A patent by its very nature is affected with a public interest. The public interest is best served, and the most effective patent examination occurs when, at the time an application is being examined, the Office is aware of and evaluates the teachings of all information material to patentability. Each individual associated with the filing and prosecution of a patent application has a duty of candor and good faith in dealing with the Office, which includes a duty to disclose to the Office all information known to that individual to be material to patentability as defined in this section. The duty to disclose information exists with respect to each pending claim until the claim is cancelled or withdrawn from consideration, or the application becomes abandoned. Information material to the patentability of a claim that is cancelled or withdrawn from consideration need not be submitted if the information is not material to the patentability of any claim remaining under consideration in the application. There is no duty to submit information which is not material to the patentability of any existing claim. The duty to disclose all information known to be material to patentability is deemed to be satisfied if all information known to be material to patentability of any claim issued in a patent was cited by the Office or submitted to the Office in the manner prescribed by §§ 1.97(b)-(d) and 1.98. However, no patent will be granted on an application in connection with which fraud on the Office was practiced or attempted or the duty of disclosure was violated through bad faith or intentional misconduct. The Office encourages applicants to carefully examine:
(1) Prior art cited in search reports of a foreign patent office in a counterpart application, and
(2) The closest information over which individuals associated with the filing or prosecution of a patent application believe any pending claim patentably defines, to make sure that any material information contained therein is disclosed to the Office.
(b) Under this section, information is material to patentability when it is not cumulative to information already of record or being made of record in the application, and
(1) It establishes, by itself or in combination with other information, a prima facie case of unpatentability of a claim; or
(2) It refutes, or is inconsistent with, a position the applicant takes in:
(i) Opposing an argument of unpatentability relied on by the Office, or
(ii) Asserting an argument of patentability.
A prima facie case of unpatentability is established when the information compels a conclusion that a claim is unpatentable under the preponderance of evidence, burden-of-proof standard, giving each term in the claim its broadest reasonable construction consistent with the specification, and before any consideration is given to evidence which may be submitted in an attempt to establish a contrary conclusion of patentability.
(c) Individuals associated with the filing or prosecution of a patent application within the meaning of this section are:
(1) Each inventor named in the application;
(2) Each attorney or agent who prepares or prosecutes the application; and
(3) Every other person who is substantively involved in the preparation or prosecution of the application and who is associated with the inventor, with the assignee or with anyone to whom there is an obligation to assign the application.
(d) Individuals other than the attorney, agent or inventor may comply with this section by disclosing information to the attorney, agent, or inventor.
(e) In any continuation-in-part application, the duty under this section includes the duty to disclose to the Office all information known to the person to be material to patentability, as defined in paragraph (b) of this section, which became available between the filing date of the prior application and the national or PCT international filing date of the continuation-in-part application.
Elson Silva, PhD
Av. Dr. Julio Soares de Arruda, 838
Parque São Quirino
13088-300 Campinas, SP, Brazil
Phone 55 *19 3256-7265
Email: el_silva@uol.com.br
-----Mensagem original-----
De: ghosh.d7@gmail.com [mailto:ghosh.d7@gmail.com] Em nome de Dipayan Ghosh
Enviada em: sábado, 9 de abril de 2011
Cc: president; philip.e.hughes; peter.nicholls; faghri; diana.garzon; dianna.l.geissert; dipayan.ghosh; dina.giovanelli; dionna.givens
Assunto: Re: Pursuing Academic Pride at
Dr Silva,
As a former University Scholar at UConn, I must say that the avenue you have chosen to spread your message - via email to UConn's entire academic community - is not only inappropriate, but also a waste of valuable time to anyone who has received this email. Moreover, your long email has been written unprofessionally and appears to have been composed without due thought. Please take up your complaints with the right people, and in the right tone.
Also, though I don't know Dr. Faghri personally, a friend of mine has worked with him and I know that he is a highly respected professor and researcher at UConn. From an academic perspective, I believe you should reconsider your situation and think twice about your intended actions.
Sincerely,
Dipayan Ghosh
--
Cornell ECE Graduate Student
On
Your message
To: Faghri, Amir
Subject: RES: Pursuing Academic Pride at
Sent:
was read on
Nicholls, Peter [peter.nicholls@uconn.edu]
Your message was read on
Peter Nicholls
Title PROVOST & EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
Department PROVOST & EXVP ACAD AFF
De: Mail Delivery System [mailto:MAILER-DAEMON@smtps.uol.com.br]
Enviada em: sexta-feira, 6 de maio de 2011 12:38
Para: el_silva@uol.com.br
Assunto: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
This is the mail system at host a2-socom7.uol.com.br.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.
The mail system
Blocked (in reply to RCPT TO command)
Blocked (in reply to RCPT TO command)
