Sunday, May 7, 2017

Honeywell - No brain for inventing and even less for honesty


Pursuing a balance with NATURE

_________________________________________________________________

Hydrology Breakthrough vs. USPTO Conspiracy


The Conspiracy – USPTO is running a broad Reinvention Scheme that let Lawyers writing scientific patents and allowing IP rights of issues they are not known in the art!


‘...  If you have a point to make about my treatment of hydrological concepts, I ask that you take the time to explain your specific points of disagreement.  I note that my work is better represented in my publications (available at http://www.stroockgroup.org/home/publications​) than in patents, as the lawyers have been translated the latter into legalese that I do not understand.’

Food for thought – If an inventor PhD from Harvard can have USPTO issued patents to protect his intellectual property rights but he does NOT understand it, how much the Patent Attorney and Patent Examiner knows about the issue granted protection by US Government. If it holds true, it means that Lawyers know about science more than scientists do. Amazing! I just imagine Albert Einstein trying to get patents with his scientific papers .. . It means that those guys in the patenting affairs would handle Theory of Relativity more than him . . . Now I understand why Americans are the leaders of the world . . . awesome, this is simply magical. Mayday Mr. Snowden .  . .mayday mother nature!

My ‘scientific breakthrough’ deals deeply with Hydrogeology/Soil Physics/Hydrology. When I took classes at the Pennsylvania State University of such disciplines during my PhD in Soil Science I remember seeing no single Law student as classmate.

If my patent was being violated I had simple questions to pursue:

·       Was it a casual violation or a clear biased trend?
·       Had the examiner already cited my patent earlier?
·       Did the inventors and examiner have technical-scientific background in the issue?
·       Was the violator a wealthy party?
·       Was the examiner citing my patent to be sure he was granting new claims not claimed before?
·   Why my issued patent was being randomly cited for irrelevant patents and ignored when violated blatantly? 
-------------------

From: Moulis, Thomas <Thomas.Moulis@uspto.gov> 
Date: Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:40 PM 
Subject: RE: Conspiracy and Brainwashing III – USPTO is preaching to their Patent Examiners that they do not need to be known in the art for judging and allowing IP rights when issuing patents! 
To: Elson Silva, PhD <tubarc@gmail.com>

You are a fool--- 

If you can’t understand legal or technical writing, you have no business blogging about it 

“Wicking” is a term of art---fluid will travel in any direction via the fibers—regardless of gravity

-------------------

"Wick/wicking is in the patent classification system but not on HYDROLOGY textbooks."


The US Government states that LEGAL WICKING is not technical, being inert to gravity LAWS, meaning that LEGAL OIL LAMPS and LEGAL CANDLES can work upsided down. This sort of deceiving is behind the Economic Melting Down of 2008 burning about 41 trillion dollars, also dumping 1,1 million American as the leader of the pandemic catastrophe that  took around 7 million lives world widely. In addition, obesity and sedentarism letting human beings miss brain capacity by becoming grumpier and dumber on neurogenesis effect.

Science is our understanding on nature functioning. Humans learn to respect nature early as babies on the first steps taming gravity for walking and running. Soon we understand the consequences of missteping and falling down. Therefore, all issued patents dealing with wick/wicking are CERTAINLY frauded because PATENT EXAMINERS ignored their homework from the beginning of their lives - GRAVITY.


---------------------------------

De: Owen, Steven [mailto:steven.owen@uconn.edu]
Enviada em: quarta-feira, 5 de outubro de 2011 11:36
Para: Elson Silva, PhD

Assunto: RE: {SPAM?} Protecting Hydrology Science from REINVENTION

Mr. Silva, has anyone ever called you a nutcase? 

Are people out to get you? 

Are you having some trouble keeping up with your medications?


---------------------------------
Steven V. Owen
University Professor Emeritus
Educational Psychology
---------------------------------

Dr. Owen, my medicine is a bit bitter than that one swallowed by Albert Einstein by just stretching his tongue:

http://youtu.be/E3d-JRg28p8

https://youtu.be/czv2OiiC5wA

The Conspiracy

Abraham Duncan Stroock
Dept: Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering
Title: Associate Professor
email: ads10@cornell.edu

Education

Ph.D., Harvard University, Chemical Physic (2002)
M.S., University Paris VI and XI,Solid State Physics (1997)
B.A. Cornell University, Physics (1995)


De: Abraham Duncan Stroock [mailto:abe.stroock@cornell.edu]
Enviada em: terça-feira, 22 de abril de 2014 22:20
Para: Elson Silva, PhD
Assunto: RE: [06856] Protecting Hydrology Science from REINVENTION by corrupt LAY PEOPLE colluding with USPTO - US Pat 8,701,469

Dear Dr. Silva,
​
‘...  If you have a point to make about my treatment of hydrological concepts, I ask that you take the time to explain your specific points of disagreement.  I note that my work is better represented in my publications (available at http://www.stroockgroup.org/home/publications​) than in patents, as the lawyers have been translated the latter into legalese that I do not understand.’

Best regards,

Abe
___________________________________________________________
De: Elson Silva, PhD [mailto:el_silva@uol.com.br]
Enviada em: terça-feira, 22 de abril de 2014 23:40
Para: 'Abraham Duncan Stroock'
Cc: cko3@cornell.edu; TDO1@cornell.edu; MGS22@cornell.edu; SBW11@cornell.edu; el_silva@uol.com.br
Assunto: RES: [06856] Protecting Hydrology Science from REINVENTION by corrupt LAY PEOPLE colluding with USPTO - US Pat 8,701,469
Prioridade: Alta

Abe,

You are so naive.

‘…Are you sure you got your PhD at Harvard? ‘

Lawyers learn nothing about Hydrology in Law School.

As far as I know no Law School provides Hydrology teaching . . . No Lawyer could discuss Hydrology having no expertise in the subject!

This is funny!
You do not give your scientific papers to Lawyers, so why are your patents different?
(By the way, was it a Lawyer who wrote your PhD thesis?)

Also, Lawyers are illiterate on the functioning of science, besides most scientists have no idea about Epistemology, Metaphysics, Logics, and History of Science (Philosophy of Science).

_________________________________________________________________



Honeywell - Ignoring Hydrology Science and Issued Patents

My Demand to USPTO

It is not that hard to argue at the Court of the Law that Hydrological issues should be examined by Hydrologists.
My demand to USPTO is the same as the first letter sent on Oct. 2006:

1. Hire Examiners with background in Hydrogeology and/or Soil Physics so that they have full comprehension of fluids moving on porosity;
2. Cancel issued patents with scientific flaws. Obsolete patents are cancelled naturally by becoming outdated;
3. Make a public statement about Hydrology negligence hurting all Hydrological community as well as my project that needs experts in Hydrology to protect the content of my issued claims.
4. Compensate for my losses since as an inventor filing patents I was not expecting lay people handling hydrology in the examination process by USPTO.
5. Since USPTO is failing to protect my IP rights my patents should be eligible for time extension of their expiration dates (new demand).
6. Issue a bill requiring Hydrology be handled by Hydrologists preventing laypeople from harming standing common knowledge in the scientific literature (new demand).
7. Disclose the technical and educational background of the Patent Examiners showing their expertise boundaries for judgment (new demand).
8.  Make people accountable for breaking THE LAW regarding my complaints (old demand).
_____________________________________________________________________________
US 6,766,817, p. 23, line. 24) ‘A fluid generally possesses characteristics of internal adhesion-cohesion, which leads to its own strength and attraction to the solid phase of porosity. Capillary action is a theoretical proposal to deal with fluid movement on porous systems, but capillary action is restricted to tubing geometries that are difficult to apply because such geometries do not permit lateral fluid flow. Nevertheless, the geometry of the cylinder is one of the best rounding microstructure to concentrate attraction toward the core of the rounding circle because the cylinder only permits longitudinal flow. In order to provide a required lateral flow in the porosity, a special geometric figure of tube like is disclosed herein. Such a geometric figure is defined herein as simply comprising a "tubarc"--a combination of a tube with an arc.’ 

US pat 6,766,817, July 17, 2004 ‘FIG. 15 illustrates a frontal overview of a hydrodynamic modeling of a main tubarc pattern showing the twisting of the longitudinal slit opening, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention; ‘

I did not invent a new can opener! My scientific breakthrough (US Pat. 6,766,817) developed new conceptions into Hydrodynamics to update textbooks addressing Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity mentioned in only 26 issued patents so far. Today Thermal/Heat Conductivity is mentioned in 90,555 issued patents, Electrical/Electric Conductivity is mentioned in 67,946 issued patents while lay people address fluid moving on porosity as wick/wicking in 30,639 issued patents ignoring Hydrology knowledge. Wick/wicking is in the patent classification system but not on hydrology textbooks. 

Mr. Varga Daly in this patent application below had no single paragraph to address Hydrology.

_____________________________________________________________________________

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.
101 Columbia Road
P O Box 2245
Morristown NJ 07962-2245

Maryann Maas
Reg. No.  38954
847-391-2137
maryann.maas@uop.com

Education




20140102134      TUBULAR CONDENSERS HAVING TUBES WITH EXTERNAL ENHANCEMENTS    

Abstract
Improvements in tubes, which increase the heat exchange capacity of tubular heat exchangers using the tubes, are described. These improvements involve the use of one or more external surface enhancements, optionally combined with an internal enhancement and/or differing tube geometries. These improvements apply, for example, to internal condensers, including those in which the tube bundles are oriented vertically, in vapor-liquid contacting apparatuses such as distillation columns.

Claims


1. A method of exchanging heat between a first fluid and a second fluid, the method comprising condensing the first fluid on external surfaces of a tube bundle for a condenser comprising tubes, wherein at least a portion of the tubes, in an axially extending section, have internal surfaces having a coating comprising a porous metallic matrix bonded thereon, and have external surfaces comprising circumferentially extending fins, and passing the second fluid through the tubes.



6. A method of purifying a lower boiling component from an impure mixture by distillation, the method comprising: (a) contacting a vapor enriched in the lower boiling component on the external surfaces of a plurality of condenser tubes of an apparatus for vapor-liquid contacting, comprising a vertically oriented column having disposed therein the plurality of condenser tubes extending substantially vertically over a section of the column length, wherein at least a portion of the condenser tubes have external surfaces comprising one or more surface enhancements, and (b) passing a cooling fluid through the condenser tubes.



9. The method of claim 6, wherein the surface enhancements comprise circumferentially extending fins.


[0021] Other embodiments of the invention are directed to tube bundles for a condenser comprising tubes as described above. According to particular embodiments, at least a portion of the tubes, in an axially (e.g., vertically or horizontally, depending on the orientation of the tube bundle) extending section, have internal surfaces having a coating (e.g., a porous metallic matrix as discussed above) bonded thereon, and have external surfaces comprising circumferentially extending fins. These circumferential fins may be characteristic of "low finned" tubes having a height from about 0.76 mm (0.03 inches) to about 3.8 mm (0.15 inches). The circumferentially extending fins may have outer edges that include a plurality notches. According to particular embodiments in the case of notches being present on the circumferentially extending fins, these notches may be aligned axially with respect to adjacent circumferentially extending fins and/or they may be bent at their respective corners outside of the plane of the circumferentially extending fins. According to other embodiments, at least a portion of the tubes have a non-linear central axis and/or a twisted geometry, as discussed above, in the axially extending section, and optionally a plurality of spaced apart points of external contact with adjacent tubes. According to other embodiments, tube bundles may comprise tubes having two or more types of shaped recessions on the external surface, namely smaller discreet shaped recessions and larger, axially extended shaped recessions. The smaller recessions can advantageously provide capillary action to reduce the condensate fluid layer thickness by using the liquid surface tension. Outer edges of these recessions may be aligned in axially extending rows along the external surfaces of the tubes.

[0050] In the same manner as described above with respect to notches on outer edges of fins, notches or recessions having various cross-sectional shapes may be formed directly on the outer surfaces of heat exchanger tubes to provide surface enhancements. Extending these notches in the axial direction on the tube surface results in elongated troughs about the tube periphery. Alternatively, discreet, shaped recessions may be formed on the external tube surface. While the recessions themselves may be small, if desired, in order to provide an effective capillary action that reduces condensate layer thickness, such smaller recessions may be aligned axially to provide an axial or generally axial flow path for condensed liquid. FIG. 5 depicts tubes 2 having shaped recessions 36a, 36b on the external surface, where a portion of these recessions 36a are smaller and are aligned in axially extending rows 22a, for example, with outer edges of the recessions in a row 22a forming a line that extends axially along the external surface of the tube. As discussed above, these smaller, discreet shaped recessions 36a on the tube surface can act as capillaries, such that the surface tension of the condensed liquid is drawn into recessions 36a. In a representative embodiment, in order to provide capillary action, each individual shaped recession will normally have only a small area, typically less than about 5 mm2 (7.8.times.10-3 in2) and often in the range from about 0.1 mm2 (1.6.times.10-4 in2) to about 4 mm2 (6.2.times.10-3 in2). Aligning at least some of the recessions in one or more axially extending rows allows the condensed liquid to effectively drain vertically, for example, in a vertically extending internal tubular condenser. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 5, the axially aligned, smaller, discreet shaped recessions 36a are used as surface enhancements in combination with axially elongated shaped recessions 36b (i.e., with the individual recessions extending over a longer axial portion). Both of these surface enhancements may be used in a common region of the tube that extends over a section of the length of a distillation column where condensation occurs. In the particular embodiment illustrated in FIG. 5, rows 22a of discreet, shaped recessions 36a alternate radially about the tube periphery with rows 22b of larger, axially extending shaped recessions 36b (e.g., in the form of troughs), between which rows the external surface 27 of tube 2 may be smooth. FIG. 5 also depicts internal enhancements on internal surface 25, namely spiral ridges 21, which may be used for improved heat exchange. In FIG. 6, the axially extending, shaped recessions 36b are in the form of troughs having a triangular cross-sectional shape. 

[0051] FIGS. 7A-7D illustrate in more detail some representative cross sections of tubes having shaped recessions 36 on their external surfaces 27. In particular, the shaped recessions 36 in FIGS. 7A and 7D have a curved cross-sectional shape that is semi-circular, while the shaped recessions 36 in FIG. 7B have a triangular cross-sectional shape. Other curved and rectangular (e.g., semi-elliptical and square) cross-sectional shapes are possible. Another embodiment in which tube surfaces are enhanced with shaped recessions 36 is shown in FIG. 7C, where, as in FIG. 7B, the cross-sectional shapes of recessions 36, spaced (e.g., uniformly) about the periphery of the surface of tube 2, are triangles. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 7C, however, these triangles are broad enough such that only small sections or points of the external surface 27 of tube 2 remain (or are not part of the shaped recessions), with these sections being spaced radially about the periphery of tube 2. The axial extension of these sections or points results in axially extending ridges. Such a tube with axially extending, shaped recessions 36b or troughs aligned in axial rows 22b is also illustrated in the front view of FIG. 6. 

[0052] In FIG. 7D, the axially extending ridges, similarly formed between these shaped recessions, have a smooth, curved (e.g., semi-circular) cross-sectional shape of the same or a similar dimension as the curved cross sectional shape forming the shaped recessions. The cross sectional shape of this tube therefore has a generally circular perimeter defined by alternating, concave and convex curves (e.g., semi-circles). The resulting, smooth external surface contrasts with the embodiment shown in FIG. 7A, where the shaped recessions form edges. Therefore, as shown, for example in the embodiment of FIG. 7D, the shaped recessions can provide a fluted profile of a fluted tube. Fluted tubes or other tubes having axially extending shaped recessions or discreet, shaped recessions aligned in axially extending rows as depicted, for example, in FIGS. 7A-7D may be characterized as having two outer diameters. Smaller and larger outer diameters may be the distances, respectively, to opposing deepest points of recessions 36 and opposing external surfaces 27, with each of these distances being measured through the center of the cross section of tube 2. Representative tubes having axially extending shaped recessions will have smaller and larger outer diameters in the ranges from about 13 mm (0.5 inches) to about 32 mm (1.25 inches) and from about 19 mm (0.75 inches) to about 38 mm (1.5 inches), respectively. In exemplary embodiments, such a tube will have outer diameters of about 19 mm (0.75 inches) and about 25 mm (1.0 inches) or outer diameters of about 25 mm (1.0 inches) and about 32 mm (1.25 inches). 

[0056] The use of axially or generally extending shaped recessions and/or fins, in this manner, as tube surface enhancements, can reduce condensate film thickness and/or facilitate condensate drainage, thereby improving the heat transfer coefficient of the tube. Such features as surface enhancements for tubes are particularly advantageous in internal tubular condensers (e.g., disposed in distillation columns), where the heat exchange surface area, as well as the total weight of equipment that can be practically installed (e.g., at or near the top of the column or tower) are both limited. The tube surface enhancements discussed above may be used alone or in combination. The tube surface enhancements may also be used in combination with internal enhancements as discussed above, and particularly spiral ridges that may act to further improve heat transfer. Otherwise, these surface enhancements may be combined with a coating, such as a porous metallic matrix used to form an enhanced boiling layer as discussed above, that is bonded onto internal surfaces of the tubes, for example, in at least the same region of the tubes (e.g., extending over a section of the column height) as the surface enhancements. The surface enhancements may also be used in tube bundles in which all or a portion of the tubes have a non-linear central axis (e.g., a helical axis), or otherwise have a twisted tube geometry as discussed above, in at least the same region of the tubes as the surface enhancements. In a representative embodiment, for example, a tube bundle of a condenser, having tubes with a fluted tube profile and an internal enhancement including one or more spiral ridges, is aligned vertically in the upper section of a distillation column. Various other combinations of surface enhancements, optionally with an internal surface coating and/or non-linear or twisted geometries, can be incorporated into tubes to improve their heat transfer coefficient, particularly when the tubes are used in a tube bundle that is oriented vertically and used in a service in which condensate drains vertically from the external surfaces of the tubes (i.e., on the "shell side" of the condenser). 


I would like to suggest Americans to send messages to those emails below pledging them to be honest and stop violating intellectual property rights allowing huge corporations to reinvent issued patents shamefully violating science.


adel.tannous@honeywell.com
adsorbents@uop.com
alak.bhattacharyya@uop.com
alex.gu@honeywell.com
allen.simpson@honeywell.com
andreas.kramvis@honeywell.com
andrew.abeyta@honeywell.com
andrew.millar@honeywell.com
anita.black@uop.com
anthony.cooke@honeywell.com
anthony.downer@honeywell.com
aravind.padmanabhan@honeywell.com
arthur.gooding@uop.com
barrett.cole@honeywell.com
bask.iyer@honeywell.com
bernard.fritz@honeywell.com
brad.terlson@honeywell.com
brad.williamson@uop.com
bradley.micsky@uop.com
brian.ignaut@honeywell.com
brian.tufte@honeywell.com
brian.whipps@honeywell.com
bricker@uop.com
bruce.bradford@honeywell.com
bruce.bradford@uop.com
bryan.anderson@honeywell.com
carrie.beatus@honeywell.com 
charles.bartlett@honeywell.com
chen.yao@honeywell.com
cheul.chung@honeywell.com
christopher.nicholas@uop.com
christopher.wozniak@uop.com
chunbo.zhang@honeywell.com
claudio.bertelli@uop.com
cleopatra.cabuz@honeywell.com
colleen.szuch@honeywell.com
colleen.szuch@uop.com
dalia.grimberg@honeywell.com
dan.gillis@uop.com
daniel.bause@honeywell.com
daniel.collette@honeywell.com
dave.anderson@honeywell.com
dave.cote@honeywell.com
dave.smith@uop.com
david.cole@honeywell.com
david.hoiriis@honeywell.com
david.zook@honeywell.com
deborah.chess@honeywell.com
denis.vaillancourt@uop.com
dennis.obrien@uop.com
derek.raybould@honeywell.com
dina.khaled@honeywell.com
don.tegart@honeywell.com
douglas.mullen@honeywell.com
edward.grolz@honeywell.com
érika.wilson@uop.com
eugen.cabuz@honeywell.com
eugenio.polla@uop.com
feng.xu@uop.com
francis.kulacki@honeywell.com
frank.digiglio@honeywell.com
gary.harpell@honeywell.com
gary.zulauf@honeywell.com
gasproc@uop.com
gavin.towler@uop.com
gdg@uop.com
gianjun.chen@uop.com
glen.davies@uop.com
glen.sanders@honeywell.com
gordon.jones@honeywell.com
graeme.mitchell@honeywell.com
gregory.ansems@honeywell.com
gregory.lewis@uop.com
guanghui.zhu@uop.com
heather.brown@uop.com
howard.que@honeywell.com
ian.andrews@honeywell.com
ian.christie@honeywell.com
igor.palley@honeywell.com
info@uop.com
ip.docketcleck@uop.com
james.cox@honeywell.com
james.harris@uop.com
james.paschall@honeywell.com
james.paschall@uop.com
james.rekoske@uop.com
james.rodgers@honeywell.com
jeff.miller@honeywell.com
jeffery.bricker@uop.com
jeffrey.singer@honeywell.com
jennifer.holmgren@uop.com
jennifer.wilson@uop.com
jeremy.whitley@uop.com
joe.zmich@uop.com
johan.backstrom@honeywell.com
john.chapples@honeywell.com
john.lundberg@honeywell.com
john.sensny@honeywell.com
john.shudy@honeywell.com
jonathan.martin@honeywell.com
joseph.kocal@uop.com
karen.m.houle@honeywell.com
kate.adams@honeywell.com
keith.pratt@honeywell.com
kevin.harrison@honeywell.com
kris.fredrick@honeywell.com
kurt.luther@honeywell.com
kurt.vantassel@uop.com
kwacala.cindy@honeywell.com
larry.palguta@honeywell.com
laura.leonard@uop.com
leopold.presser@honeywell.com
luis.ortiz@honeywell.com
lynn.thompson@honeywell.com
manuela.serban@uop.com
marcia.wright@honeywell.com
margaret.floyd@honeywell.com
mark.cohen@honeywell.com
mark.goldberg@uop.com
mark.schroeder@honeywell.com
mark.turowicz@uop.com
mark.willis@uop.com
marker@uop.com
martin.jones@honeywell.com
martin.kelly@honeywell.com
martin.kristoffersen@honeywell.com
martin.williamson@honeywell.com
maryann.maas@uop.com
mattias.bjorklund@honeywell.com
maureen.bricker@uop.com
max.gerlach@honeywell.com
michael.sobczyk@honeywell.com
michelle.dumetier@honeywell.com
mike.schultz@uop.com
nancy.briggs@uop.com
nancy.iwamoto@honeywell.com
nancy.parsons@honeywell.com
neil.hendricks@honeywell.com
palani.hanigachalam@honeywell.com
paul.dwyer@honeywell.com
paul.esatto@honeywell.com
paul.meighan@honeywell.com
paul.mravcak@honeywell.com
pemilowe@uop.com
peter.bernstein@honeywell.com
peter.reutiman@honeywell.com
peter.unger@honeywell.com
phillip.daly@uop.com
phillip.johnson@honeywell.com
pitkin@uop.com
ptbarger@uop.com
ramsesh.anilkumar@honeywell.com
randy.leclaire@honeywell.com
raymond.tucker@honeywell.com
raymond.tucker@uop.com
rhonda.germany@honeywell.com
richard.isherwood@uop.com
richard.marinangeli@uop.com
richard.smith@honeywell.com
richard.willis@uop.com
rob.ferris@honeywell.com
robert.bedard@uop.com
robert.follett@uop.com
robert.higashi@honeywell.com
robert.schmidt@uop.com
robert.worrall@honeywell.com
rodney.thorland@honeywell.com
roger.criss@honeywell.com
roger.fradin@honeywell.com
ron.bardell@honeywell.com
ron.gatan@uop.com
ronald.rohrbach@honeywell.com
russell.johnson@honeywell.com
sachtler@uop.com
saju.ramachandran@honeywell.com
sandeep.mete@honeywell.com
sandra.thompson@honeywell.com
scott.arms@honeywell.com
shane.tedjarati@honeywell.com
simon.bare@uop.com
simpson@uop.com
soumitri.kolavennu@honeywell.com
stephen.lupton@honeywell.com
stephen.wilson@uop.com
stephen.yates@honeywell.com
steven.eickhoff@honeywell.com
steven.fischman@honeywell.com
steven.lankton@uop.com
sthompson@buchalter.com 
stuart.cutler@honeywell.com
stuart.harris@honeywell.com
stuart.simpson@uop.com
susan.gross@uop.com
thomas.spinelli@honeywell.com
thomas.strangman@honeywell.com
timothy.brandvold@uop.com
tom.rezachek@honeywell.com
tony.cowburn@honeywell.com
ulrich.bonne@honeywell.com
virginia.szigeti@honeywell.com
wayne.anderson@honeywell.com
wei.yang@honeywell.com
wensheng.chen@uop.com
william.anderson@honeywell.com
william.mcgeever@honeywell.com
wolfgang.spieker@uop.com
yuandong.gu@honeywell.com
zhou@uop.com
Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)