HYDROTECHNOLOGY - A New Science
Pursuing a balance with NATURE
_________________________________________________________________
Hydrology Breakthrough vs. USPTO Conspiracy
The Conspiracy – USPTO is running a broad Reinvention Scheme that let Lawyers writing scientific patents and allowing IP rights of issues they are not known in the art!
‘... If you have a point to make about my treatment of hydrological concepts, I ask that you take the time to explain your specific points of disagreement. I note that my work is better represented in my publications (available at http://www.stroockgroup.org/home/publications) than in patents, as the lawyers have been translated the latter into legalese that I do not understand.’
Food for thought – If an inventor PhD from Harvard can have USPTO issued patents to protect his intellectual property rights but he does NOT understand it, how much the Patent Attorney and Patent Examiner knows about the issue granted protection by US Government. If it holds true, it means that Lawyers know about science more than scientists do. Amazing! I just imagine Albert Einstein trying to get patents with his scientific papers .. . It means that those guys in the patenting affairs would handle Theory of Relativity more than him . . . Now I understand why Americans are the leaders of the world . . . awesome, this is simply magical. Mayday Mr. Snowden . . .mayday mother nature!
My ‘scientific breakthrough’ deals deeply with Hydrogeology/Soil Physics/Hydrology. When I took classes at the Pennsylvania State University
If my patent was being violated I had simple questions to pursue:
· Was it a casual violation or a clear biased trend?
· Had the examiner already cited my patent earlier?
· Did the inventors and examiner have technical-scientific background in the issue?
· Was the violator a wealthy party?
· Was the examiner citing my patent to be sure he was granting new claims not claimed before?
· Why my issued patent was being randomly cited for irrelevant patents and ignored when violated blatantly?
-------------------
From: Moulis, Thomas <Thomas.Moulis@uspto.gov>
Date: Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:40 PM
Subject: RE: Conspiracy and Brainwashing III – USPTO is preaching to their Patent Examiners that they do not need to be known in the art for judging and allowing IP rights when issuing patents!
To: Elson Silva, PhD <tubarc@gmail.com>
From: Moulis, Thomas <Thomas.Moulis@uspto.gov>
Date: Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:40 PM
Subject: RE: Conspiracy and Brainwashing III – USPTO is preaching to their Patent Examiners that they do not need to be known in the art for judging and allowing IP rights when issuing patents!
To: Elson Silva, PhD <tubarc@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:40 PM
Subject: RE: Conspiracy and Brainwashing III – USPTO is preaching to their Patent Examiners that they do not need to be known in the art for judging and allowing IP rights when issuing patents!
To: Elson Silva, PhD <tubarc@gmail.com>
You are a fool---
If you can’t understand legal or technical writing, you have no business blogging about it
“Wicking” is a term of art---fluid will travel in any direction via the fibers—regardless of gravity
-------------------
"Wick/wicking is in the patent classification system but not on HYDROLOGY textbooks."
The US Government states that LEGAL WICKING is not technical, being inert to gravity LAWS, meaning that LEGAL OIL LAMPS and LEGAL CANDLES can work upsided down. This sort of deceiving is behind the Economic Melting Down of 2008 burning about 41 trillion dollars, also dumping 1,1 million American as the leader of the pandemic catastrophe that took around 7 million lives world widely. In addition, obesity and sedentarism letting human beings miss brain capacity by becoming grumpier and dumber on neurogenesis effect.
Science is our understanding on nature functioning. Humans learn to respect nature early as babies on the first steps taming gravity for walking and running. Soon we understand the consequences of missteping and falling down. Therefore, all issued patents dealing with wick/wicking are CERTAINLY frauded because PATENT EXAMINERS ignored their homework from the beginning of their lives - GRAVITY.
The US Government states that LEGAL WICKING is not technical, being inert to gravity LAWS, meaning that LEGAL OIL LAMPS and LEGAL CANDLES can work upsided down. This sort of deceiving is behind the Economic Melting Down of 2008 burning about 41 trillion dollars, also dumping 1,1 million American as the leader of the pandemic catastrophe that took around 7 million lives world widely. In addition, obesity and sedentarism letting human beings miss brain capacity by becoming grumpier and dumber on neurogenesis effect.
Science is our understanding on nature functioning. Humans learn to respect nature early as babies on the first steps taming gravity for walking and running. Soon we understand the consequences of missteping and falling down. Therefore, all issued patents dealing with wick/wicking are CERTAINLY frauded because PATENT EXAMINERS ignored their homework from the beginning of their lives - GRAVITY.
---------------------------------
De: Owen, Steven [mailto:steven.owen@uconn.edu]
Enviada em: quarta-feira, 5 de outubro de 2011 11:36
Para: Elson Silva, PhD
Assunto: RE: {SPAM?} Protecting Hydrology Science from REINVENTION
Mr. Silva, has anyone ever called you a nutcase?
Are people out to get you?
Are you having some trouble keeping up with your medications?
---------------------------------
Steven V. Owen
University Professor Emeritus
Educational Psychology
---------------------------------
Dr. Owen, my medicine is a bit bitter than that one swallowed by Albert Einstein by just stretching his tongue:
_________________________________________________________________
The Conspiracy
Abraham Duncan StroockDept: Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering
Title: Associate Professor
email: ads10@cornell.edu
Education
Ph.D., Harvard University
M.S., University Paris VI and XI,Solid State
De: Abraham Duncan Stroock [mailto:abe.stroock@cornell.edu]
Enviada em: terça-feira, 22 de abril de 2014 22:20
Para: Elson Silva, PhD
Para: Elson Silva, PhD
Assunto: RE: [06856] Protecting Hydrology Science from REINVENTION by corrupt LAY PEOPLE colluding with USPTO - US Pat 8,701,469
Dear Dr. Silva,
‘... If you have a point to make about my treatment of hydrological concepts, I ask that you take the time to explain your specific points of disagreement. I note that my work is better represented in my publications (available at http://www.stroockgroup.org/home/publications) than in patents, as the lawyers have been translated the latter into legalese that I do not understand.’
Best regards,
Abe
___________________________________________________________
De: Elson Silva, PhD [mailto:el_silva@uol.com.br ]
Enviada em: terça-feira, 22 de abril de 201423:40
Para : 'Abraham Duncan Stroock'
Cc: cko3@cornell.edu; TDO1@cornell.edu; MGS22@cornell.edu; SBW11@cornell.edu;el_silva@uol.com.br
Assunto: RES: [06856] Protecting Hydrology Science from REINVENTION by corrupt LAY PEOPLE colluding with USPTO - US Pat 8,701,469
Enviada em: terça-feira, 22 de abril de 2014
Cc: cko3@cornell.edu; TDO1@cornell.edu; MGS22@cornell.edu; SBW11@cornell.edu;
Assunto: RES: [06856] Protecting Hydrology Science from REINVENTION by corrupt LAY PEOPLE colluding with USPTO - US Pat 8,701,469
Prioridade: Alta
Abe,
You are so naive.
‘…Are you sure you got your PhD at Harvard? ‘
Lawyers learn nothing about Hydrology in Law School.
As far as I know no Law School
This is funny!
You do not give your scientific papers to Lawyers, so why are your patents different?
(By the way, was it a Lawyer who wrote your PhD thesis?)
Also, Lawyers are illiterate on the functioning of science, besides most scientists have no idea about Epistemology, Metaphysics, Logics, and History of Science (Philosophy of Science).
Mr. Jean-Eric Paquet
Director-General - EU
Research and Innovation - RTD
E-mail: iean-eric.paquet@ec.europa.eu
Dear Mr. Paquet,
I was not expecting that a PhD in Soil Science playing advanced gardening at home would develop a new science. Perhaps, deep innovation comes much more from intellectual resources than economic funding!
Self-watering potted plant EPTV https://youtu.be/oq5_2LMFTlM
Hummingbird nesting between clothespin in a clothesline https://youtu.be/czv2OiiC5wA
I am curious on what you have in mind about the Research an Innovation of the European Union to support a new science that I have been conceiving deeply for more than two decades.
Hydrology has been neglected on fluidic devices in the patenting affairs more than a century offering a huge opportunity for upgrading on so many applications.
BACKGROUND: Man started using artificial porosities around 70,000 years ago developing oil lamps. The device was very important on handling small fire consuming less fuel per time. The basic conception was employing natural fibers called wick to connect fuel in the bottom toward the flame on the top. This porosity device had to resist to high temperature of flames. The fluid goes up and evaporates leaving the porosity system after burning. Nowadays, modern industry can make synthetic fibers of plastic that do not resist to the high temperature of flames and cannot be used on oil lamps, but can transmit water upward on self-watering of potted plants. Then, I was lucky employing such devices because water leaves the porosity system by evapotranspiration. I realized that the nylon cord fails as a wick on oil lamps. Consequently, a sort of technical and scientific gap was available to explore.
I have a deep background to understand that this fluid movement upward on porosity is called ‘UNSATURATED HYDRAULIC FLOW’ in Soil Physics/Hydrogeology. I got surprised having an American patent, (US 6,766,817) issued so easily, and that wick is heavily mentioned on fluidic devices as inventors had no idea about UNSATURATED FLOW, meaning that they are not aware about flow dynamics between Hydraulic Zones Saturated/Unsaturated. This process was tenable as the patents became available on line in the internet in the beginning of this millennium.
People that try to develop fluidic devices handling artificial porosities just ignore Hydrology. Today, November 27. 2019, by tracking dynamics in the American patenting system, thermal conductivity it is mentioned in 137,732 issued patents; electrical conductivity is mentioned in 109,448 issued patents while hydraulic conductivity of fluid moving on porosities is mentioned in only 1050 issued patents. This is taking place because lay people skirting common knowledge address it as wick/wicking, which is mentioned in 44,466 issued patents. Movement of fluids on porous systems above the water table as UNSATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY is portrayed in only 32 issued patents.
I would not have hurry to develop my project, but the mining situation in Brazil is deteriorating fast getting always worse with unpredictable outcome depending on the size of coming tragedies from mining residue dam collapsing. Solid rock after grinding loses its mechanical support and should flow downhill one day favored by a bounty water recharge. As a PhD in Soil Science, I must say that ground rock does not become soil overnight. The weathering of rocks takes thousands or millions of years. By correcting the mining operation, we can spare lives, protect the environment and profit on many technological edge expanded by an updated knowledge from Hydrology on artificial porosity systems.
Tragic Dam Collapse in Brazil https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDwQv-mM3tk
Drone footage showing the damage https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGaQ0vjHZE0
Running uphill as fast as you can go https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQMdyCuFAMs
Running uphill as fast as you can go https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQMdyCuFAMs
If EU can host and develop my science Hydrotechnology, I have no problems relocating permanently to Europe and work together broadly in this complex project. Antoine Lavoisier is French and father of Modern Chemistry. Alfred Nobel was working with explosives as a father of dynamite. Now, we can have a NEW ERA OF HYDROLOGY, the science of life expanding our understanding on artificial porosity that started with flowerpots on self-watering borrowing insights from Soil Physics/Hydrogeology and biological porosities learning with phloem and xylem.
I must say that I feel honored if EU join me in this enterprise of innovation I bumped to, having no cue on how far the boundaries we could conquer.
I am looking forward to exchange ideas on the best approach to achieve such goals.
Kind regards,
Campinas, November 28, 2019
Elson Silva, Ph. D.
Av. Dr. Júlio Soares de Arruda, 838
Parque São Quirino
CEP 13088-300 - Campinas - SP - Brazil
Phone 55 *19 3256-7265
Email: tubarc@gmail.com
p.s. Nature is on our side . . . it took around 12 years
for this cactus to bloom.
